Pages

Friday, November 23, 2007

Cocktail-serving robots invade Vienna this week

Over at Boing Boing this morning, I see that uber-blogger/novelist/speaker/electronic freedom fighter Cory Doctorow is planning on speaking at the Roboexotica symposium that gets under way in Vienna, Austria, tomorrow.

I hadn't heard of Roboexotica myself until I was in Austin, Texas, last month covering the Maker Faire there. At dinner one night with some of the Maker Faire folks, I Make Things video blogger Bre Petis started telling me about the event. And as often happens when smart people tell me about amazing things, my inner geek got very excited.

If you're not familiar with Roboexotica, this is how it's explained on the official Web site: "Until recently, no attempts had been made to publicly discuss the role of cocktail robotics as an index for the integration of technological innovations into the human Lebenswelt, or to document the increasing occurrence of radical hedonism in man-machine communication. Roboexotica is an attempt to fill this vacuum. It is the first and, inevitably, the leading festival concerned with cocktail robotics worldwide. A micro mechanical change of paradigm in the age of borderless capital. Alan Turing would doubtless test this out."

Starting tomorrow, a conference on cocktail-serving robots begins in Vienna, Austria.

(Credit: Roboexotica)

Now, I don't know what "Lebenswelt" means but I get the gist of it. In fact, if it weren't for the fact that people I know to be serious about things like this were actually traveling to Vienna, I might have thought Roboexotica was a prank. After all, "cocktail robotics?"

But it is real, and I wish I were going.

It turns out that the topics being discussed at the symposium don't all have to do with programming robots to serve gin and tonics--though, since I don't speak German, I'm not entirely sure what much of the program is about.

What I can see on the English version of the festival's site, however, looks pretty interesting. You've got Doctorow speaking about "why consciousness uploading, post-human existence and life after the Singularity are popular today, and why science fiction is always about the present," and Petis is doing his own talk on "the apocalyptic utopia."

Fun stuff.

Now all we need to do is figure out how to get the organizers to do a San Francisco edition of their event sometime in the future, and I can guarantee a rabid local response. Zombies, meet cocktail-serving robots.

Google U.S. Web search share jumps to 58.5 percent

Google U.S. Web search share jumps to 58.5 percent

Google enjoyed one of its biggest monthly gains in U.S. Web search market share in October, building on consistent gains over the past two years, according to industry data out on Wednesday.

Market research firm ComScore said Google's core Web search properties captured 58.5 percent of the U.S. market in October, up from 57.0 percent in September.

The top five providers of Web search all showed at least 5 percent growth in the number of searches in October. Yahoo was number two after Google, followed by Microsoft, InterActiveCorp's Ask.com and Time Warner's network of sites, including AOL.

"They are all growing in the number of search queries but Google is taking a disproportionate share," ComScore spokesman Andrew Lipsman said by phone.

Yahoo sites had 22.9 percent of the U.S. market, a 0.8 percentage-point fall from September. Microsoft slipped to 9.7 percent from 10.3 percent, Ask was flat at 4.7 percent and Time Warner's network dipped 0.1 percentage point to 4.2 percent.

Google shares rose more than 3 percent to a high near $670 before settling back later in regular Nasdaq trade to $666.51, up 2.8 percent. Yahoo shares fell 3.1 percent to $25.87, while Microsoft stock was off half a percentage point at $34.39.

On Tuesday, broker Credit Suisse set a $900 price target on Google, a new Wall Street high, arguing that the Silicon Valley Internet leader is poised to monopolize search.

"We believe that search is a natural monopoly business and expect that over time Google will continue to gain share until they have effectively reached 100 percent," Credit Suisse analyst Heath Terry wrote in a research note to investors.

Google attracted 6.1 billion searches of the 10.5 billion searches conducted by U.S. Web users last month. Total search activity grew 12 percent over September, which is typically a slow month until students return to school.

In recent months, ComScore has introduced an expanded measure of search activity on major Internet sites including not just searches on, for example, Google.com but also searches on other Google properties such as video-sharing site YouTube.

By this measure, Google's Web search activity grew 14.8 percent, or faster than the single-digit growth rates of rivals Yahoo, Microsoft and Time Warner.

Search activity for News Corp's Fox Interactive Media dipped 1.8 percent, with its biggest property, social network leader MySpace, declining 1.7 percent. Comparable data for MySpace rival Facebook was not available in the survey.

YouTube, MySpace, and California's DMV

YouTube, MySpace, and California's DMV

As YouTube videos go, Kyle's driving test has nothing on Gizmo, the toilet-flushing cat.

But the California Department of Motor Vehicles remains convinced that its 55 videos running on the Web site will make roads a better place to travel, or at the very least, help new drivers to embrace the logic of a traffic circle.

The foray into video sharing, supplemented by the department's page on MySpace.com, is meant to pull in drivers of all ages with driving tips, traffic trivia and, perhaps inadvertently, life advice, dispensed as the Tao of intersections.

"You have to accept right of way when it is yours," Anita says from the Visalia office.

The most popular videos are those that explore the top 10 reasons people fail driving tests. There is abundant instruction on the meaning of dotted white lines, parallel parking and blind spots, much of it set to music apparently performed by an '80s glam rock cover band. Actors simulate parking gone wrong and other driving misadventures.

Since the department's effort began last month, some of the clips have been viewed nearly 5,000 times. In comparison, "Gizmo Flushes" has been viewed 3.4 million times over the last 18 months.

"We are always looking at ways to reach people, teens especially," said a department spokeswoman, Jan Mendoza. "And let's face it, the Internet is huge. We thought it would be really cool since YouTube is free."

Visitors to the DMV's MySpace page can "Ask George" questions about all manner of things vehicular, like: "Is it illegal to drive under the speed limit on the freeway? It sure seems unsafe."

And: "I was recently issued a traffic citation. Is it possible for me to pay for it online?"

People can also register to vote and conduct DMV business.

"It is kind of a complement to the YouTube," Mendoza said.

As is perhaps less than surprising for a DMV MySpace page, the department has fewer than 40 friends. One has made positive comments about the program, posting, "DMV has made great strides in customer service and has broken that old stereotype!!"

But that person is Mendoza, whose own MySpace page shows her in full rodeo regalia.

Oh, and "Kyle" fails his driving test, a bit of news he absorbs like the soap opera star he may someday be. No matter. He has a bunch of department videos to set him on his way.

Parents the winner in Leopard, Vista showdown

In a showdown of new parental controls in Apple's Leopard versus Microsoft's year-old Vista, there's one clear winner--the parent.

When Apple unveiled its newest operating system on October 26, the computer maker made its first major overture to parents by infusing Leopard with a slick set of child controls. New settings help parents manage a child's time online, block use of certain Web sites or applications like instant chat or iTunes, and watch over what kids do and who they communicate with when Mom and Dad aren't around.

Apple was playing catch-up to Microsoft's parental controls for Vista, which the computer giant unveiled in January. It, too, made its biggest push into the parental-control market with Vista, adding the same finely tuned features, so much so that parental advocates say Vista's parent controls are a reason to buy the software. And that's true of Apple now, too.

OS screen shots

"The battle to one-up each other in parental controls is only going to benefit consumers," said Chris Swenson, director of software industry analysis at the research firm the NPD Group. "There's really no excuse now for parents not to lock down their PCs for their children."

Parents are clearly paying more attention to technology for managing their children's computer use, especially as more kids venture online at younger ages. As one proof point, U.S. retail sales of parental control software were up 47.3 percent in the first nine months of 2007 over the same period last year, according to NPD, which tracks sales of major retailers such as Amazon.com and BestBuy. Top sellers at stores are controls from Enteractive, Microforum, and ContentWatch.

Apple and Microsoft don't have numbers on how many customers use parental controls, but analysts say the feature will easily be a selling point for Leopard and Vista this holiday season. Apple sold 2 million copies of Leopard in the first weekend it was available, blowing away early adoption rates of its Tiger software. In contrast, Microsoft has sold as many as 88 million copies of Vista.

Despite the uptick in U.S. retail sales of parental controls, some parents buy such software and then are left baffled by how to use it, or don't have the time to properly install it, according to analysts and parent advocates. That's why experts believe that operating-system software must be extremely easy and effective to use--which both Vista and Apple have proved to be so far. As millions of parents begin to upgrade their computers with the preinstalled software, parental controls on the PC may start to become mainstream, they say.

"Parental controls at the operating system level is really the best way on the family PC."
--Anne Collier, co-director, ConnectSafely.org

"Parental controls at the operating system level is really the best way on the family PC," said Anne Collier, co-director of ConnectSafely.org, a community site for parents and kid safety. "There are more options for the parent and it's seamless, rather than having to install something that may or may not crash the system."

Feature by feature, Vista's and Leopard's parental controls are on par--with time settings, various levels of site and application blocking, and log activity files. But for parents of kids who play games online or on the desktop, Vista offers parents an edge with more granular controls for games. The settings include detailed age and content appropriateness ratings for games from an industry nonprofit called the Entertainment Software Rating Board, or ESRB. Parents of a 5-year-old boy could allow him to only play "early childhood" games, for example.

"That's definitely a strength with Vista--where families are using it for gaming it has the rating system so that parents can block games based on (their child's age and content appropriateness)," said Tom Laemmel, Windows product manager. That parental control feature was recently added to Microsoft's Xbox, too.

In terms of user interface, however, Apple controls come off cleaner and simpler. Parents can configure their child's Apple home page dock with only three tabs and one-click options so that younger kids operate the computer more easily. Leopard includes drop-down menus for setting when and how long a child can be on the computer. Microsoft's Vista, in contrast, offers a calendar grid to set time.

In addition, Apple's Leopard settings newly enable parents to control a child's computer from their own, unlike Vista.

"We have a rich set of parental controls that are incredibly easy to use and that give parents the flexibility to decide how to use them and to create a certain experience for their child on the Mac," said Chris Bourdon, senior product line manager for Mac OS.

Microsoft's Laemmel said the company is good at remote administrative controls in the business realm, but in the home, it's unnecessary.

"Within the home environment, you want it to be straightforward, you don't want to have to have an IT person," Laemmel said.